ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Community perspectives on dogs, health risks, and veterinary care impacts in rural Alaska.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advocating for incorporating public veterinary health care into human health systems.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Beyond clinical skills: student-reported impacts of a veterinary public health externship in rural Alaska.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Veterinary care in much of Alaska is extremely limited due to the high cost of living and low access to care. To date, community perspectives on veterinary care and the efficacy of veterinary services introduced have not been documented in Alaska Native communities, in this case specifically the Yukon Kuskokwim (YK) Delta of Alaska. This stymies the introduction of thoughtful public policy created with community insights. It also impedes program funding and awareness of the public health importance of veterinary care. This study aims to utilize information from surveys to form a basis in literature for veterinary medicine in rural Alaska and to document community perspective input to aid in making veterinary care sustainable in this region. Using information gathered from 390 surveys completed in 25 YK Delta communities between 2019-2024, The authors found general support for dogs being a part of the community and culture in YK Delta communities. Specifically, nearly all respondents like dogs (95%), 94% of respondents reported owning animals, and dogs are the most common type of animal owned or cared for in this region by far (92%). Yet community members feel that stray and unwanted dogs are a problem (71%) and loose dogs are feared (69%). Respondents also report that dogs spread waste and garbage around their community (75%). Perceptions of and actual ability to access veterinary care are low. Community members report dogs have low rates of vaccination (a reported 62% rate of rabies vaccination) and low sterilization rates (53% reported rate of sterilization surgeries completed). Consequences of overpopulation noted by respondents also include dog bites and attacks, and negative impacts of having to remove unwanted dogs from the community. Recommendations are given on actions to take on the federal, state, city, and village levels to increase access to veterinary care based on these findings. Increasing awareness of the current state of veterinary care and the potential benefits to humans and animals is a key step to improving access to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.