ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
From digital traces to public vaccination behaviors: leveraging large language models for big data classification.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The current study leverages large language models (LLMs) to capture health behaviors expressed in social media posts, focusing on COVID-19 vaccine-related content from 2020 to 2021. Methods: To examine the capabilities of prompt engineering and fine-tuning approaches with LLMs, this study examines the performance of three state-of-the-art LLMs: GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, and GPT-4o-mini with fine-tuning, focusing on their ability to classify individuals' vaccination behavior, intention to vaccinate, and information sharing. We then cross-validate these classifications with nationwide vaccination statistics to assess alignment with observed trends. Results: GPT-4o-mini with fine-tuning outperformed both GPT-4o and the standard GPT-4o-mini in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Using GPT-4o-mini with fine-tuning for classification, about 9.84% of the posts ( Discussion: This study suggests that LLMs can serve as powerful tools for estimating real-world behaviors. Methodological and practical implications of utilizing LLMs in human behavior research are further discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.