ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Case Report: Tislelizumab-induced insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a case report and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tislelizumab-induced hyperosmolar diabetic ketoacidosis complicated with rhabdomyolysis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tislelizumab is approved for cancer immunotherapy. Tislelizumab-induced insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is infrequent, but life-threatening; to date, no reports have been published in English. The study aims to analyze the adverse effect. A case of tislelizumab-induced IDDM was reported. The study also reviewed published cases of developing IDDM after using tislelizumab, by systematic search of PubMed, CNKI, WANFANG and VIP (the latter three, Chinese article databases). Seventeen patients (including ours) were included. The mean age was 65.7 years and 73% (11/15) were male. IDDM usually appeared after 8.4 cycles. The mean random glycemia was 35.9 mmol/L, however, the hemoglobin A1c was only 8.5%. Eighty percent (12/15) presented with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). One hundred percent showed inappropriately low C-peptide (15/15) and undetectable autoantibodies (14/14). Insulin was immediately administered to all patients and 50% (8/16) had relatively stable glycemic control lastly. Similar to previous reports, tislelizumab-induced IDDM is characterized by a more rapid progression to severe insulin deficiency, frequently with DKA. However, unlike previous ones, islet autoantibodies were absent in all cases, possibly because of racial differences. These findings offer valuable safety warnings and allow doctors to identify and treat tislelizumab-induced IDDM timely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.