ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025
Machine Learning Strategies for Preoperative PJI Diagnosis: Integrative Analysis of Serum and Synovial Fluid Markers.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is crucial for guiding treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes. This study aims to develop a new diagnostic model for the preoperative diagnosis of PJI based on serum and synovial fluid markers and further validate its effectiveness. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from patients admitted for joint revision surgery between January 2018 and October 2022, selecting serum and synovial fluid markers as variables for the study. The most suitable diagnostic markers were selected using LASSO regression, and eight machine learning (ML) models were constructed based on the selected markers. The diagnostic performance and clinical utility of the ML models were assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, decision curve analysis, and clinical impact analysis. Finally, the best model was compared to existing diagnostic standards using an external validation cohort. Results: A total of 376 cases were analyzed (263 in the training cohort and 113 in the validation cohort), with 111 cases (29.52%) diagnosed as PJI. The ML models included SE-IL6, SE-CRP, ESR, SF-IL6, PMN%, DD, and ALB. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting model was the optimal model, achieving an area under the curve of 0.998 (95% CI 0.993-1) in the test set, outperforming other models. It also recorded the lowest Brier score of 0.062 and the highest F1 score of 0.985. In the external validation cohort, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the ML diagnostic model were higher than those of the MSIS 2013 and ICM 2018 diagnostic criteria. Conclusion: Our newly developed ML diagnostic model can assist clinicians in rapidly and accurately diagnosing PJI before surgery and has potential value for timing decisions regarding two-stage revisions. It has high economic value and clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.