Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40771816›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025

Innovative microbial strategies in atopic dermatitis.

Jingtai Ma, Yiting Fang, Jinxing Hu, Shiqi Li, Lilian Zeng, Siyi Chen, Zhifeng Li, Ruiling Meng, Xingfen Yang, Fenglin Zhang and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jingtai Ma *Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Yiting Fang *Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Jinxing HuGuangzhou Chest Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Shiqi LiGuangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Lilian ZengGuangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Siyi ChenGuangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Zhifeng LiGuangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Ruiling MengGuangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Xingfen YangNational Medical Products Administration (NMPA) Key Laboratory for Safety Evaluation of Cosmetics, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Fenglin ZhangGuangzhou Institute of Microbiology Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
Guiyuan JiGuangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Peihua LiaoXinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Uighur, China.
Liang ChenGuangzhou Chest Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Wei WuGuangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is characterized by chronic and recurrent itching with a high burden of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs, a measure of overall disease burden). Traditional treatments mainly include corticosteroids, which have a good effect on controlling inflammation but adverse side effects. Recently, advancements in understanding the pathogenesis of AD have led to the emergence of a variety of novel therapeutic approaches, such as microbiome manipulation, offering renewed hope for more effective management of this condition. These strategies are particularly promising for mild-to-moderate AD, where dysbiosis and immune imbalance (e.g., Th2 skewing) are key drivers, though some approaches (e.g., fecal microbiota transplantation) are being explored for refractory cases. It has been shown that microbiome manipulation has the potential to improve disease states and regulates the balance of the inflammatory system in a variety of ways. Various approaches have been preclinically and clinically tested, including probiotics (and multiple co-applications), prebiotics, postbiotics, unmethylated CpG motifs, fecal microbiota transplantation, herbal fermentation technology with microorganisms and phage. In this review, we discuss these microbiome manipulation methods and emphasizes the potential of microbiome-based interventions to modulate Th1/Th2 balance with fewer side effects, ultimately leading to control of inflammation in AD. Further translational research in this field is needed to integrate when we apply this therapy and the capability for disease treatment and prevention.

Indexed as

Dermatitis, AtopicGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsDysbiosisFecal Microbiota TransplantationHumansPrebioticsProbioticsPrebioticsatopic dermatitisCpG-ODNsfecal microbiota transplantationherbal fermentation technologymicrobial strategiespostbioticsprebioticsprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID40771816
PMCPMC12325183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.