ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Harnessing multi-omics and artificial intelligence: revolutionizing prognosis and treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal treatment selection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of immunotherapy.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Article
- Advancing risk stratification in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization: the promise of the NTAA model.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026Article
- Clinical applications of immunogenomics in hepatocellular carcinoma.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Review
- Overcoming MDSC-Mediated Immunosuppression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Mechanisms to Novel Immunotherapeutic Approaches.Cancers · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Prognostic Stratification of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Evidence, Clinical Applications, and Future Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Drug resistance mechanisms of immunotherapy and translational strategies for reversing resistance for hepatocellular carcinoma: from bench to bedside.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Joint latent profiles of death anxiety and treatment adherence in HCC patients.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- The translational paradox of AI in hepatocellular carcinoma: from algorithmic over-engineering to real-world clinical utility.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Advancements in artificial intelligence for cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction: current applications and emerging opportunities.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Omics and artificial intelligence integration for stratifying blast crisis CML using COSMIC signatures and pan-cancer precision drug repurposing.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Innovative Approaches to Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Diagnostic Breakthroughs, Biomarker Integration, and Artificial Intelligence.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most prevalent form of liver cancer, characterized by elevated mortality rates and heterogeneity. Despite advancements in treatment, the development of personalized therapeutic strategies for HCC remains a substantial challenge due to the intricate molecular characteristics of the disease. A multi-omics approach has the potential to offer more profound insights into HCC subtypes and enhance patient stratification for personalized treatments. Methods: A comprehensive data set comprising clinical, transcriptomic, genomic and epigenomic information from HCC patients was retrieved from the TCGA, ICGC, GEO and CPTAC databases. To identify distinct molecular subtypes, a multi-omics data integration approach was employed, utilizing 10 distinct clustering algorithms. Survival analysis, immune infiltration profiling and drug sensitivity predictions were then used to evaluate the prognostic significance and therapeutic responses of these subtypes. Furthermore, machine learning models were employed to develop the artificial intelligence-derived risk score (AIDRS) with the aim of predicting patient outcomes and guiding personalized therapy. Results: The present study identified two distinct HCC subtypes (CS1 and CS2, respectively), each exhibiting different clinical outcomes and molecular characteristics. CS1 was associated with better overall survival, while CS2 exhibited higher mutation burden and immune suppression. The AIDRS, constructed using a multi-step machine learning approach, effectively predicted patient prognosis across multiple cohorts. High AIDRS score correlated with poor prognosis and a limited response to immunotherapy. Furthermore, the study identified CEP55 as a potential therapeutic target, as it was found to be overexpressed in CS2 and associated with poorer outcomes. Conclusions: The integration of multi-omics data has been demonstrated to provide a comprehensive understanding of HCC subtypes, thus enhancing the prediction of prognosis and guiding personalized treatment strategies. The development of the AIDRS offers a robust tool for risk stratification, while CEP55 has emerged as a promising target for therapeutic intervention in HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.