ArticleDigital health
Stochastic-based learning for image classification in chest X-ray diagnosis.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metaheuristic-Optimized Convolutional Neural Network for Automated Diagnosis of Viral Pneumonia and Tuberculosis from Chest X-Rays.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The current research introduces a stochastic deep learning method with the aim of enhancing lung disease detection, particularly pneumonia, in chest X-ray images. The goal is to improve diagnostic precision and help facilitate more effective clinical practices. Methods: We deployed a better convolutional neural network architecture, thoroughly optimized with dropout regularization and aggressive data augmentation to support classification performance as well as model resilience. The training process utilized stochastic deep learning using stochastic gradient descent, with K-Fold cross-validation and early stopping used for exhaustive model optimization and against overfitting. Results: Experiment results invariably prove the efficacy and efficacy of the suggested method. Throughout the validation folds, the model recorded marked improvements in precision and loss measures. It is interesting to see that on fold 5, the suggested model registered a remarkable accuracy of 0.9940 and precision of 0.9960 in diagnosing pneumonia. Conclusions: This deep learning strategy provides an effective tool for computerized, precise identification of lung diseases from chest X-rays. Its high accuracy has great promise for applications in real-world clinical practice, allowing for earlier and more consistent diagnoses, which could result in timely interventions and ultimately help reduce severe outcomes and rates of mortality in patients. Although extremely promising, additional validation on varied, large datasets and implementation within clinical decision support systems will be important for widespread use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.