Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40771751›Full record

ArticleJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology2025

Supporting Administrative Time for Advanced Practitioners: A Comprehensive Approach.

Merdith Beaton, Andrea Edwards, Wendy Vogel, Haleigh Mistry, Lisa Kottschade, Sara Toth, David Johnson, Heather Koniarczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Next in Line: Building a Succession Pipeline for Advanced Practitioners in Oncology.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Merdith BeatonFrom University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Andrea EdwardsVirginia Oncology Associates, Suffolk, Virginia.
Wendy VogelConexiant, Tampa, Florida.
Haleigh MistryMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Lisa KottschadeMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sara TothTexas Oncology, Fort Worth, Texas.
David JohnsonMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Heather KoniarczykConexiant, Tampa, Florida.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced practitioners (APs), including nurse practitioners (NPs), physician assistants (PAs), clinical nurse specialists, and pharmacists, are pivotal in health care. Despite their critical role, record numbers of APs are leaving the profession, primarily due to poor work-life balance, which contributes to burnout and high turnover rates. This article explores the impact of administrative time on AP job satisfaction and retention, drawing from recent surveys and case studies. Findings indicate that dedicated administrative time significantly enhances job satisfaction and reduces burnout, with data showing that APs with administrative time are less likely to leave their roles. The Advanced Practitioner Society for Hematology and Oncology (APSHO) prioritized addressing AP burnout in 2024 by advocating for structured administrative time. Following an extensive review of the literature and survey data, the APSHO Administrative Time Subcommittee recommends 8 hours of administrative time per week as reasonable for a full-time AP in clinical outpatient practice. Additionally, this committee proposes a comprehensive model for implementing administrative time. The call to action is clear: to sustain a high-quality health-care workforce, it is essential to support APs through policies that promote work-life balance, retention, and operational efficiency.

Identifiers

PMID40771751
PMCPMC12322939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.