ArticleJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology2025
Operationalization and Use of Bispecific T-Cell-Engaging Antibodies in Community Practices: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Developing Logistics and Workflow for Cytokine Release Syndrome Management.
Article in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Operationalizing workflows to manage cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in community practices presents challenges for multidisciplinary teams. Real-world experience was gathered from OneOncology community health-care professionals to establish best-prac-tice workflows for CRS management. Methods: Qualitative data were gathered via focus groups from hematology-oncology MDs, PharmDs, and nurse providers ( Results: Three themes were identified: (1) creating a coordinated workflow plan, (2) building network partnerships, and (3) understanding patient support. Workflow decisions were driven by community practices managing patients treated with BsAbs or partnering with sites for initial dosing and maintenance. Catalysts for developing CRS workflows included: FDA approval of BsAbs; BsAbs clinical trial experience; BsAbs on formulary; having patients receiving BsAbs; and practice champion(s) for protocol development. Key steps included defining communication during and after practice hours, designating training leads, and creating practice-specific plans for interdisciplinary team coordination. Inpatient admission processes developed with hospital staff and hospital staff training were fundamental for successful patient management. Communication processes among practice, pharmacy, and hospital staff throughout BsAbs treatment were established, along with methods to ensure the availability of CRS treatment if needed. Continuous patient/caregiver education on BsAbs treatment, monitoring for adverse events (particularly CRS), and how/when to access care were described. Conclusions: BsAb use in community settings requires multidisciplinary coordination between practices and hospitals. Actions included identifying practice champions, establishing clear workflows for transitioning patients between inpatient and outpatient settings, and ensuring continuous training of staff, patients, and caregivers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.