ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2025
Embedding narrative medicine in primary healthcare: Exploration and practice from a medical humanities perspective.
Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Continuing medical education in renal pathology: current practices and needs among nephrologists.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Reimagining medical education: integrating medical humanism and narrative medicine into a new educational paradigm.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Determinants of Chinese physicians' engagement in narrative medicine: a comprehensive SEM-ANN analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the integration of narrative medicine (NM) into primary healthcare (PHC) settings, evaluating its role in enhancing medical humanities education within grassroots healthcare institutions. Through a comprehensive literature review and case analysis, the research investigates the current state, challenges, and practical barriers to embedding NM into PHC systems, while proposing targeted strategies for improvement. The findings suggest that NM fosters stronger doctor-patient trust, enhances healthcare quality, and promotes humanistic care. However, primary hospitals face numerous challenges in advancing medical humanities, including a lack of trust between doctors and patients, tensions arising from the commercialization of healthcare, institutional limitations, unequal distribution of resources, and issues related to physicians' professional competencies and stress management. These interrelated obstacles detract from the quality of PHC services and the overall patient experience. Drawing on successful case studies from primary hospitals, the paper outlines effective strategies for overcoming these challenges. The study provides both theoretical and practical insights for advancing medical humanities in PHC, contributing to improvements in healthcare service quality and supporting the development of high standards in the healthcare sector. Ultimately, the findings aim to promote the broader adoption and ongoing refinement of NM within PHC institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.