Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40771689›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic integration and resistance analysis of cefquinome against

Chongyang Li, Junli Wang, Fanxi Guo, Fengyichi Zhang, Baochang Chen, Zihan Wang, Di Cao, Zugong Yu

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chongyang LiLaboratory of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Division of Basic Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Junli WangLaboratory of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Division of Basic Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Fanxi GuoLaboratory of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Division of Basic Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Fengyichi ZhangLaboratory of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Division of Basic Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Baochang ChenLaboratory of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Division of Basic Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Zihan WangLaboratory of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Division of Basic Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Di CaoLaboratory of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Division of Basic Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Zugong YuLaboratory of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Division of Basic Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methods: In this study, a peristaltic pump one-compartment open model was established to investigate the relationship between the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices of cefquinome (CFQ) against Results: Static time-killing curves showed that the population of Discussion: In conclusion, CFQ showed good efficacy and time-dependence. This study provides a reference for optimizing CFQ administration in

Indexed as

dynamic modelmultiple low-dosagepharmacodynamicpharmacokineticsimulationsingle high dosage

Identifiers

PMID40771689
PMCPMC12325258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.