ArticleJournal of analytical science and technology2025
Application of a hand-held supplementary light for extending field-based net ecosystem exchange carbon flux measurements in low light conditions.
Article in Journal of analytical science and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Manual chamber-based carbon flux measurements are frequently used to capture terrestrial carbon cycle processes over vegetated areas. Light response curves, achieved by sequential shading, enable obtaining model parameters of light compensation points, maximum photosynthetic rates and dark respiration. However, light conditions in the field are sometimes, or in higher northern latitudes frequently limited, especially in darker seasons and areas with frequent cloud and fog, which questions the robustness of fitted model parameters. Artificial light therefore offers a crucial way to assess and address these potential limitations, especially recent advances in LED lights with improved wavelength spectra and irradiance. However, previous LED lights were fixed on the chamber top, blocking out natural light, heavy and with a high-power demand unsuitable for remote field deployment. Here we tested a handheld LED torch as a flexible, low-power and low-weight option. We investigated the wavelength spectrum and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) output under controlled conditions and applied it under light limiting field conditions. Increased PAR from short-term measurements did not increase chamber temperature significantly but improved confidence in fitted light response curves, especially for situations with higher flux variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.