Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40771670›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Biomass distribution of sympatric mammals in a European temperate forest.

Andro Pleskalt, Sebastião Farias, Toni Vicedo, Jose Manuel Álvarez-Martínez, José Valentín Roces-Díaz, Carlo Meloro, Soraia Pereira, Antonio Cruz, Jesús García, Pablo Gómez and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Andro PleskaltDepartment of Biology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Sebastião FariasDepartment of Statistics and Operational Research, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Toni VicedoBiodiversity Research Institute, CSIC - University of Oviedo - Principality of Asturias, Mieres del Camino, Principality of Asturias, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9107-826X
Jose Manuel Álvarez-MartínezBiodiversity Research Institute, CSIC - University of Oviedo - Principality of Asturias, Mieres del Camino, Principality of Asturias, Spain.
José Valentín Roces-DíazBiodiversity Research Institute, CSIC - University of Oviedo - Principality of Asturias, Mieres del Camino, Principality of Asturias, Spain.
Carlo MeloroResearch Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0175-1706
Soraia PereiraDepartment of Statistics and Operational Research, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Antonio CruzImatec Innovación S.L., Colindres, Cantabria, Spain.
Jesús GarcíaImatec Innovación S.L., Colindres, Cantabria, Spain.
Pablo GómezImatec Innovación S.L., Colindres, Cantabria, Spain.
María Ángel LamillarImatec Innovación S.L., Colindres, Cantabria, Spain.
Elena MarsellaImatec Innovación S.L., Colindres, Cantabria, Spain.
Manuel Jesús VarasGeneral Directorate of Biodiversity, Environment and Climate Change, Santander, Cantabria, Spain.
Elena ÁlvarezGeneral Directorate of Biodiversity, Environment and Climate Change, Santander, Cantabria, Spain.
Fredrik DalerumBiodiversity Research Institute, CSIC - University of Oviedo - Principality of Asturias, Mieres del Camino, Principality of Asturias, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9737-8242

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The distribution of biomass among trophic levels and different types of organisms is a key characteristic of ecosystems. However, such biomass distributions might exhibit large perturbations owing to human activities. We used long-term camera trap data from a temperate forest ecosystem within the Cantabrian range, northern Spain, to quantify the biomass distribution of 10 mammal species ranging in body mass from 300 g to almost 100 kg. The species are representative of three distinct orders and include trophic levels from primary to secondary consumers. The observed biomass distribution was bottom-heavy with a disproportionally low biomass of secondary consumers, in particular large-bodied predators. In addition, the ratio of plant biomass to the biomass of mammalian primary consumers was over 6000 : 1 for total above-ground-plant biomass and over 700 : 1 for plant biomass available for mammal consumption. We suggest that the observed biomass distribution both among mammals and between mammals and plants provide an example of trophic downgrading, and highlight the radical effects human activities might have on the structure of terrestrial ecosystems.

Indexed as

biomass distributioncamera trappingcommunity ecologyoccupancy modelstemperate foresttrophic downgrading

Identifiers

PMID40771670
PMCPMC12325915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.