Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40771631›Full record

ReviewTransactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association2025

REVOLUTIONIZING TUBERCULOSIS REGIMEN DEVELOPMENT.

Kelly E Dooley, Radojka Savic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kelly E DooleyNashville, TN.
Radojka SavicNashville, TN.

Funding

Preclinical Design and Clinical Translation of TB Regimens (PReDicTR) ConsortiumUM1AI179699 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Kelly E. Dooley, ERIC L NUERMBERGER · 2024 to 2026
$22.2M
Mentoring Investigators in HIV and Tuberculosis Therapeutics ResearchK24AI150349 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DOOLEY, KELLY E. · 2020 to 2025
$789k
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI150349NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI179699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today's first-line tuberculosis regimen was developed in the 1950s to 1970s, followed by a long period of stagnation. New drugs have progressed to market only recently, with long timelines from target discovery to clinical trial success, alongside costly Phase 3 failures. Currently, the tuberculosis drug development pipeline is robust, containing multiple new chemical entities from diverse drug classes, motivating us to optimize this opportunity to advance compounds effectively and efficiently. In this article, we explore how recent innovations in data integration and computational methods are revolutionizing tuberculosis drug development, accelerating development timelines, and heightening the probability of success. We anticipate that these breakthroughs will lead to approval of novel drugs in unprecedented time frames, marking a significant milestone in the fight against this age-old disease. This progress is timely, as resistance to even recently registered drugs is emerging rapidly. Our hope is that these strategies will also be of value in other medical fields.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsDrug DevelopmentMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisHumansAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID40771631
PMCPMC12323450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.