ArticleTransactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association2025
VERACITY AND FRAUD IN MEDICAL RESEARCH.
Article in Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scientific fraud, particularly within medical journals, is a critical and complex issue due to the potential consequences for public health. Medical research plays a crucial role in informing scientific innovation, guiding clinical practice, and driving advancements in treatments. False or misleading research can influence future discovery, lead to ineffective or harmful treatments, waste valuable resources, and erode public trust. A troubling increase in misconduct, including data fabrication and falsification, has been recently noted, although it's unclear whether this partially reflects the development of better methods of detection. Addressing the issue of scientific fraud in medical journals requires a concerted effort from all stakeholders involved, including researchers, journal editors, peer reviewers, funding agencies, and regulatory bodies. Implementing robust measures for detecting and preventing fraud, promoting transparency and accountability in research practices, and fostering a culture of integrity and ethical conduct are all essential steps toward safeguarding the integrity of medical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40771600PMC12323465What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.