Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40771581›Full record

ArticleResearch (Washington, D.C.)2024

Fast and Adaptive Multi-Agent Planning under Collaborative Temporal Logic Tasks via Poset Products.

Zesen Liu, Meng Guo, Weimin Bao, Zhongkui Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zesen LiuDepartment of Mechanics and Engineering Science, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Meng GuoDepartment of Mechanics and Engineering Science, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Weimin BaoScience and Technology Commission of China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation, Beijing 100048, China.
Zhongkui LiDepartment of Mechanics and Engineering Science, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9361-4305

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient coordination and planning is essential for large-scale multi-agent systems that collaborate in a shared dynamic environment. Heuristic search methods or learning-based approaches often lack the guarantee on correctness and performance. Moreover, when the collaborative tasks contain both spatial and temporal requirements, e.g., as linear temporal logic (LTL) formulas, formal methods provide a verifiable framework for task planning. However, since the planning complexity grows exponentially with the number of agents and the length of the task formula, existing studies are mostly limited to small artificial cases. To address this issue, a new planning paradigm is proposed in this work for system-wide temporal task formulas that are released online and continually. It avoids two common bottlenecks in the traditional methods, i.e., (a) the direct translation of the complete task formula to the associated Büchi automaton and (b) the synchronized product between the Büchi automaton and the transition models of all agents. Instead, an adaptive planning algorithm is proposed, which computes the product of relaxed partially ordered sets (R-posets) on-the-fly and assigns these subtasks to the agents subject to the ordering constraints. It is shown that the first valid plan can be derived with a polynomial time and memory complexity with respect to the system size and the formula length. Our method can take into account task formulas with a length of more than 400 and a fleet with more than 400 agents, while most existing methods fail at the formula length of 25 within a reasonable duration. The proposed method is validated on large fleets of service robots in both simulation and hardware experiments.

Identifiers

PMID40771581
PMCPMC12326542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.