ArticleJOR spine2025
Gait Analysis During Paralysis Recovery in a Rat Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Model.
Article in JOR spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gait Analysis During Paralysis Recovery in a Rat Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Model.JOR spine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In this study, we aimed to create a rat model of incomplete spinal cord injury and to determine the relationship between muscle tone and gait characteristics during recovery from paralysis. This necessity stems from the need for animal models with motor function dynamics in rehabilitation development for spinal cord injury. Methods: Thirty-eight-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided randomly into two groups: Sham and spinal cord injury groups. Three-dimensional gait analysis, Hoffman reflex, Basso-Beatie-Bresnahan score, muscle wet weight, and histological assessment were performed on postoperative days 3, 7, and 14, respectively. Results: The incomplete spinal cord injury model showed paralysis recovery over time at postoperative day 14. At ground contact, the ankle plantar flexion angle was higher in the spinal cord injury group than in the Sham group on postoperative day 3; however, it reduced on postoperative day 14. Nevertheless, the ankle plantar flexion angle on the foot-off phase was significantly higher on postoperative days 3 and 14. The ankle abduction angle in the spinal cord injury group significantly increased over time and was higher than in the Sham group at all time points. Hoffmann reflex results showed that muscle tone was significantly higher in the spinal cord injury group on postoperative day 3 and increased over time. The model's gait was significantly affected by muscle tone changes. Conclusion: The model provides a valuable tool for studying spastic gait and gait changes associated with improvement in paralysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.