ArticleBMJ nutrition, prevention & health2025
Determination of glycaemic index of selected rice landraces of Nepal using INFOGEST model.
Article in BMJ nutrition, prevention & health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The current investigation was carried out to crudely assess and characterise the starch hydrolysis parameters and determine the estimated glycaemic index (eGI) of the selected rice landraces of Nepal (ie, Method: INFOGEST harmonised in vitro protocol using pancreatic amylase instead of pancreatin for the intestinal phase was used to estimate the glycaemic index and starch digestibility parameters of the selected rice landraces of Nepal. Results: The study showed rice landraces with similar starch contents had significantly different (p<0.05) in vitro starch digestibility parameters, that is, hydrolysis index, eGI, rapidly digestible starch, slowly digestible starch, resistant starch and total hydrolysed starch with Bw showing the lowest eGI of 51.77±2.48 followed by Kw with eGI of 55.35±1.05 and Aw showing the highest eGI of 60.60±1.03. Conclusions: None of the landraces fell under the high GI class (>70). B
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.