Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40771513›Full record

ArticleBMJ nutrition, prevention & health2025

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect on human strength and endurance after resistance training and supplementation of Vicia faba protein hydrolysate compared with placebo.

Niamh Máire Mohan, Nora Khaldi, Brian Keogh, Andy Franklyn Miller

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ nutrition, prevention & health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05946746 (A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of PeptiStrong Supplementation in Conjunction with an Exercise Program to Enhance Muscle Strength in Young Subjects), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05946746 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of PeptiStrong Supplementation in Conjunction with an Exercise Program to Enhance Muscle Strength in Young Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorNuritas LtdRan2023 to 2024Enrolled72ConditionsMuscle InjuryArmsPeptiStrong, Placebo SMCC silicated micro-crystalline cellulose
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Niamh Máire MohanNuritas Limited, Joshua Dawson House, Dawson Street, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1406-6229
Nora KhaldiNuritas Limited, Joshua Dawson House, Dawson Street, Dublin, Ireland.
Brian KeoghNuritas Limited, Joshua Dawson House, Dawson Street, Dublin, Ireland.
Andy Franklyn MillerNuritas Limited, Joshua Dawson House, Dawson Street, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effects of a Design: A double-blind placebo-controlled parallel trial. Participants: 72 healthy men and women aged 19-40, stratified in a 1:1 ratio by gender. Participants were excluded if they performed >3 hours of resistance training per week in the 6 months prior. Setting: Ontario, Canada. Study performed by KGK Science from August 2023 to January 2024. Intervention: VFH or silica microcrystalline cellulose is given in five capsules daily for 56 days. Main outcome measures: Primary outcome: Leg strength Results: Intergroup analysis revealed a significantly greater increase in leg strength compared with placebo at day 28 (p=0.045) and 56 (p=0.05), respectively. Significantly enhanced muscular endurance was also observed from days 0 to 56 with a difference of 2.2 times in the change in repetitions performed from baseline (p=0.022) and a 21.6% increase compared with the placebo. Significant changes in bone mineral content were reported between groups (p=0.032) with a mean increase of 0.7% gained in the VFH group. The improvements in performance were supported by myokine analysis where VFH was shown to modulate a range of biomarkers associated with glucose homeostasis, bone formation, mitochondrial and metabolic function. Quantitative physical strength gains were consistent with qualitative data which showed significantly improved changes in self-assessed health. Conclusions: VFH supplementation demonstrated significant improvements in muscular strength, endurance and bone mineral content when compared with placebo. These low-dose, peptide-induced improvements enhance the effects of exercise for musculoskeletal health and have the potential to influence all-cause mortality Trial registration number: NCT05946746.

Indexed as

Musculo-skeletal healthNutritional treatmentPhysical performance

Identifiers

PMID40771513
PMCPMC12322553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.