Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40771485›Full record

ArticleGlobal bioethics = Problemi di bioetica2025

One health's "Jurassic Park moment": tempered reasons for optimism.

Jonathan Beever, Nicolae Morar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonathan BeeverDepartment of Philosophy and Center for Ethics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1748-0202
Nicolae MorarDepartment of Philosophy and Environmental Studies Program, Univerity of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2661-3676

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this short analysis, we argue that while One Health approaches have remained anthropocentric (i.e. morally and practically prioritizing human health), One Health is due for its "Jurassic Park moment." Such a moment would mark a shift in moral priority, balancing human interests against nonhuman interests. Examples of theory and practice in One Health support the potential for such a shift.

Indexed as

anthropocentrismenvironmental bioethicsinterdependenceJurassic Parkmoral tensionOne Health

Identifiers

PMID40771485
PMCPMC12326375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.