ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Construction and validation of a web-based dynamic predictive model for the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing day-case hysteroscopic surgery.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dexamethasone Alone versus Combined with Droperidol for Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Gynecological Day Surgery Under Ciprofol-Alfentanil Anesthesia: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Artificial intelligence for predicting perioperative anaesthetic complications and supporting clinical decision-making: a scoping review.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
- The efficacy of nursing protocol based on preoperative visualization rehearsal in the operating room, combined with intraoperative dynamic risk management and control in patients undergoing ambulatory hysteroscopy.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive risk model for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing day-case hysteroscopic surgery. Methods: The candidate predictors were identified by systematic literature review. Patients who met the study criteria were divided into training group and validation group. The time-period validation was used for the external validation of the model. The candidate predictors with statistical significance through lasso regression analyses were included in multifactor logistic regression analyses. The calibration and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to assess the accuracy of model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to assess the clinical benefit of Nomogram. All statistical analyses were constructed by RStudio software (version 4.2.1). Results: A total of five predictors were included in the PONV risk prediction model: (1) motion sickness (OR, 8.53; 95% CI, 6.21-11.81), (2) anesthesia time (OR, 4.20; 95% CI, 2.09-8.65), (3) fasting time (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.13-1.22), (4) anxiety score (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.08-1.12), and (5) artificial airway (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39-0.74). The area under the ROC curve for the training cohort and validation cohort was 85.0% (95% CI: 82.6-87.5%) and 80.3% (76.2-84.3%), respectively. Conclusion: The predictive model demonstrated potential in predicting the risk of PONV in patients undergoing day-case hysteroscopic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.