SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome in adult intensive care unit: a scoping review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07316894 (International Delphi Consensus on the Universal Definition and Diagnosis of Iatrogenic Withdrawal Syndrome in Adult ICU Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
International Delphi Consensus on the Universal Definition and Diagnosis of Iatrogenic Withdrawal Syndrome in Adult ICU Patients
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Critical Care Sedation: Emerging Clinical Considerations and Risks of Volatile Anesthetics for Sedation: A Narrative Review.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Following prolonged opioid and/or hypnotic exposure, iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (IWS) can develop in critically ill patients due to improper cessation of these drugs. While IWS is well-documented in pediatric and neonatal intensive care unit (ICU), research on adult ICU patients remains scarce. This scoping review aimed to map existing evidence on IWS in critically ill adults, focusing on diagnosis, epidemiology, risk factors, complications, clinical effects, treatment, and prevention. Methods: A literature search across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science included studies from 1990 to 2024 with prospective, retrospective, or randomized controlled trial designs. Out of 3105 retrieved titles, 29 studies met inclusion criteria. Results: Most studies addressed diagnosis (83%) and epidemiology (79%), with IWS definitions largely adapted from chronic drug users. Incidence varied from 13.6 to 49.5%. Several studies identified risk factors, primarily therapy-related, but only some performed robust statistical analyses. Complications and clinical effects were discussed in 12 studies but results on ICU and hospital outcomes were inconsistent. Physiological studies linked IWS to sympathetic overactivity and central nervous system excitability. Only 20% of studies examined treatment or prevention, with randomized trials assessing substitution therapy. Most strategies did not significantly alter IWS incidence, though clonidine showed potential benefits. Discussion: This review highlights critical knowledge gaps and the lack of consensus or guidelines for IWS in adult ICU patients, emphasizing the need for further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.