Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40771460›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

General practitioners' and medical students' current knowledge and attitudes toward non-pharmacological interventions for dementia.

Lou L Frankenstein, Lea Pickard, Philipp Franikowski, Georg Jahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lou L FrankensteinDepartment of Psychology, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany.
Lea PickardDepartment of Psychology, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany.
Philipp FranikowskiInstitute for Educational Quality Improvement, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Georg JahnDepartment of Psychology, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: General practitioners in Germany infrequently prescribe effective non-pharmacological interventions for dementia patients. The aim of this study was to investigate general practitioners' education, knowledge, and experiences as well as attitudes toward non-pharmacological interventions to identify potential strategies for increasing treatment quality. Methods: Medical students ( Results: Non-pharmacological interventions seem to be highly underrepresented in medical education. Pharmacological therapy is reported to be used more often, despite possible negative side effects and despite the proven effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatment. The general practitioners' attitudes toward behavioral and occupational therapy were heterogeneous, but uncertainty was prevalent regarding budget regulations, and reservations to allocate resources to individuals with dementia became apparent. Conclusion: To help more people with dementia and their caregivers benefit from the positive effects of non-pharmacological interventions, general practitioners need to be better informed about these treatment options.

Indexed as

behavioral therapydementianon-pharmacological interventionsoccupational therapyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID40771460
PMCPMC12325421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.