ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2025
Exploring the relationship of complementary therapy use and medication adherence among patients with epilepsy.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Complementary and alternative therapies (CATs) are widely used among patients with epilepsy (PWE), yet their impact on adherence to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) remains limited and unclear. This study aimed to (i) assess the usage, knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) related to CATs and (ii) evaluate their impact on AEDs adherence among PWE. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 193 PWE, recruited conveniently from three hospitals on the East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia. Participants' data were collected through face-to-face administration of paper-based questionnaires, including a KAP-CATs and the Malaysia Medication Adherence Scale (MALMAS). The SPSS version 26.0 was used to perform descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests. Results: Among the participants (mean age = 35.3 ± 12.6 years; female = 54.9%; Malay = 96.9%), 59.6% reported had used some types of CATs, with prayers (86.4%) and massage (78.8%) being the most common. Most participants demonstrated moderate knowledge (61.6%), neutral attitudes (78.6%) and a moderate engagement in CATs practices (47.6%). Common reasons for using CATs included greater availability (54.9%), belief in self-healing (45.6%) and the perception of a permanent cure (44.6%). Notably, only 28.5% of CATs users disclosed their use to a healthcare provider. The prevalence of non-adherence to AEDs was 22.8%, and no statistically significant association was found between usage, knowledge, attitude and practice regarding CATs and non-adherence to AEDs ( Conclusion: The findings highlight widespread use of CATs among PWE, often driven by cultural beliefs and perceived benefits. Thus, further research is warranted to explore integrative care models that ensure safe, coordinated epilepsy management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.