Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40771447›Full record

ReviewSkin appendage disorders2025

Upadacitinib for Alopecia: Current Evidence and Clinical Insights.

Thomas Stirrat, Sach Thakker, Deeptha Bejugam, Carolyn Goh, Shari R Lipner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Skin appendage disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas StirratGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, NY, USA.
Sach ThakkerGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, NY, USA.
Deeptha BejugamGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, NY, USA.
Carolyn GohUCLA Division of Dermatology, UCLA Health, Torrance, CA, USA.
Shari R LipnerIsrael Englander Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Upadacitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor, has demonstrated promising efficacy in alopecia areata (AA), particularly in patients unresponsive to conventional therapies. As JAK inhibitors gain prominence, understanding upadacitinib's role in AA management is critical. Summary: This scoping review synthesizes data from 24 publications, including 64 AA patients treated with upadacitinib (15-45 mg daily). Most patients experience substantial or complete hair regrowth within 1-4 months. The most common AA subtypes include alopecia universalis ( Key Messages: (i) Upadacitinib demonstrates good efficacy in treating AA. (ii) Its safety profile supports potential off-label use. (iii) Larger studies are essential to validate current findings and optimize management.

Indexed as

Alopecia areataHair lossJanus kinase 1 inhibitorsScoping reviewUpadacitinib

Identifiers

PMID40771447
PMCPMC12324716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.