ArticleSkin appendage disorders2025
Current Practices of Subspecialty Nail Clinics: Results of a Survey of the Members of the Council for Nail Disorders.
Article in Skin appendage disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epidemiology and Trends of Nail Disorders (2014-2024): A Single Tertiary-Center Study.Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Knowledge of the structure and function of existing nail clinics remains limited. Sharing this knowledge from nail experts who run these clinics can readily support newly trained nail clinicians in setting up their nail clinics. Method: We surveyed members of the Council for Nail Disorders (CND) to learn about the structure and practices of their nail clinics. Of the practicing CND members in any membership class, we analyzed responses from those who have nail clinics. Results: Of the 79 practicing CND members, 38 responded (48.1% response rate), of whom 25 (65.8%) had a nail clinic. Analysis of these 25 responses revealed that 52% of nail clinics were relatively new (operating <5 years). The majority (72%) were in academic settings. Medical trainees were being taught in 64% of clinics. Nail clinics were directed by either one (64%) or multiple clinicians. All experts reported using clinical photographs in their routine care for nail patients, and 96% used dermoscopy. Additionally, 96% performed punch and tangential shave biopsies, and 88% performed matrixectomy. Access to a pathologist(s) with nail expertise was available in 84% of clinics. Conclusion: Our findings characterize the current practices of nail clinics directed by CND members, serving as a guide for clinicians looking to establish their own.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.