ReviewWestern Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSAR2023
Emergency medical teams in WHO's Western Pacific Region.
Review in Western Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSAR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer without borders: Policy frameworks for oncology care in humanitarian and conflict settings.Oncotarget · 2026Review
- Emergency medical team coordination management following the 2024 Vanuatu earthquake.Western Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSARArticle
- Progress on International Health Regulations (2005) core capacities in WHO's Western Pacific Region.Western Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSARArticle
- Emergency medical team reclassification in WHO's Western Pacific Region: continuous learning and improvement of health emergency response capacities.Western Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSARArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This regional analysis aims to provide a comprehensive review of emergency medical team development and action in health emergency response in the Western Pacific Region from 2010 to 2024. It details national, subregional and regional efforts to strengthen health emergency preparedness, response and resilience; it notes challenges faced by the teams in these efforts; and it provides examples that could be adopted or adapted to strengthen their development and action around the world. Emergency medical teams are critical components of national, regional and global health emergency workforces, enabling rapid, high-quality and self-sufficient responses to health emergencies domestically or internationally. They comprise clinical, mental health, public health, logistics and water/sanitation/hygiene personnel who collaborate in providing critical services to affected populations during health emergencies. By the end of 2024, emergency medical teams had been established in nearly every country in the Western Pacific Region, with 16 classified for international deployments, and many national teams developed to strengthen response to domestic emergencies. This analysis is based on published peer-reviewed literature on emergency medical team development and action in health emergencies in the Western Pacific Region, as well as publicly available data on team collaboration and deployment for health emergency response. This analysis considers the global evolution of the World Health Organization Emergency Medical Team Initiative and describes its development in the Western Pacific Region, including how the teams have contributed to emergency response efforts, and the key enabling factors and challenges faced as they develop and respond to emergencies. The analysis concludes by highlighting opportunities for future development, collaboration, research and insights that may be applicable to the global development of emergency medical teams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.