Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40771409›Full record

ReviewOpen life sciences2025

The dilemma of food genetics and improvement.

Mohamed Zarid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open life sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohamed ZaridLaboratory of Botany, Biotechnology and Plant Protection, Faculty of Science, Ibn Tofail University, BP 242, Kenitra, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advancement of genetic techniques in food production offers significant potential for improving crop quality, yield, and sustainability. However, these innovations present a complex set of dilemmas concerning nutritional quality, food authenticity, socioeconomic implications, regulatory challenges, and human health. This article explores contemporary genetic methods such as marker-assisted selection, genome editing (CRISPR-Cas9), and tissue culture, highlighting their applications and limitations. Additionally, transgenic approaches and biofortification strategies are examined for their role in enhancing nutritional value. It examines the trade-offs between organoleptic properties and nutritional integrity, revealing a concerning trend toward prioritizing sensory attributes over health benefits. Furthermore, the potential health implications of genetic manipulation, including links to autoimmune and hormonal disorders, are critically analyzed with a focus on allergenicity concerns and long-term safety assessments. The discussion underscores the urgent need for sustainable practices in food genetics that align with environmental goals and public health priorities. Finally, a call to action is made for collaborative dialogue among scientists, policymakers, and consumers to prioritize health, sustainability, and transparency in food production, ensuring that agricultural advancements benefit all stakeholders while preserving the ecological balance for future generations.

Indexed as

biofortificationcrop improvementfood authenticityhealth risksnutrients

Identifiers

PMID40771409
PMCPMC12326302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.