ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
A quality improvement initiative to improve transport team mobilization for emergent neonatal transfers.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contemporary Evidence on Interhospital Neonatal Transport as a Potentially Sepsis-Relevant Care Interval: A Scoping Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Neonatal Interfacility Transport to Tertiary and Quaternary Centres: Clinical Outcomes and System-Level Determinants-A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Using quality improvement to optimize neonatal transport team process metrics for critical transfers.Pediatric research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A considerable number of neonatal deaths can be attributed to delays in accessing appropriate medical care or the absence of reliable systems for transferring newborns to advanced care centers. Infants requiring urgent transfer to specialized neonatal units are particularly vulnerable, often due to the limited capabilities of peripheral birthing facilities, the absence of structured neonatal transport networks, and the reliance on unsafe or uncoordinated transfer methods. Approximately 25% of neonatal transfers are time-sensitive and require specialized neonatal teams to respond promptly. Any delay in the mobilization of the retrieval team can adversely affect the delivery of this essential time-sensitive care. Methods: This single-center quality improvement (QI) study was conducted at a tertiary care center with a Level 3B NICU. We aimed to reduce our MT to ≤10 min in >70% of emergent neonatal transfers within 3 months. Multiple change ideas and Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles (designation of transport nurse, education regarding timely mobilization, keeping prechecked retrieval kit, keeping all equipment together) were carried out. Results: MT was reduced to ≤10 min in 70.6% of transfers, and MT was under 15 min in 80.6% of emergent neonatal transfers, achieving the benchmark of 15 min given for "launch time" by the Australian New Zealand Neonatal Retrieval Network (ANZNRN) 2022 data dictionary. Conclusion: Effectively formulated and executed QI strategies can accelerate the benchmark time-related quality indicators for urgent neonatal transport teams during critical neonatal transfers. Our study encourages other healthcare setups to improve MT through simple yet effective measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.