ArticleGland surgery2025
A convenient model based on mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative differentiation of breast phyllodes tumors and fibroadenomas.
Article in Gland surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Differentiation between breast phyllodes tumors (PTs) and fibroadenomas (FAs) remains a key clinical challenge, which is critical for formulating clinical treatment strategies. This study aimed to establish a fusion model based on mammography (MG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the preoperative differentiation of PTs and FAs. Methods: The clinical data, MG images, and magnetic resonance (MR) images of patients with breast FAs treated in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from October 2019 to December 2020, as well as patients with PTs treated from January 2011 to December 2020, were retrospectively collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to select independent factors and to construct a diagnostic model to differentiate PTs and FAs. The diagnostic performance of the model was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: A total of 147 patients with FAs and 138 patients with PTs were included in this study. Patient age, maximum diameter of mass, density on MG images, lobulation on MR images, and time-intensity curve (TIC) were independent factors contributing to the differential diagnosis. Finally, the fusion model showed satisfactory discrimination [area under the curve (AUC) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-0.94] and calibration. DCA indicated good clinical benefit, as indicated by most values being within threshold probabilities. Conclusions: Breast MG and MRI findings help differentiate between FAs and PTs preoperatively. The multimodal fusion model was clinically efficacious and thus useful for accurate clinical diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.