ArticleGland surgery2025
Development and validation of a prediction model for lymph node metastasis in thyroid cancer: integrating deep learning and radiomics features from intra- and peri-tumoral regions.
Article in Gland surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in immunotherapy for thyroid malignancies: from molecular targets to clinical outcomes.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- The relationship between the extent of extrathyroidal extension and lymph node metastasis based on propensity score matching analysis.Gland surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current preoperative imaging methods, such as ultrasound, are limited by operator dependency and suboptimal sensitivity for detecting central lymph node metastasis (CLNM). This study aimed to propose a method that integrates deep learning and radiomics to accurately predict lymph node metastasis in thyroid cancer by analyzing intra- and peri-tumoral imaging features, thereby improving the preoperative prediction accuracy. Methods: From July 2020 to June 2022, 405 patients diagnosed with PTC were enrolled from two centers: Center 1 (Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital) with 294 patients divided into a training set (n=294) and an internal validation set, and Center 2 (Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University) with 111 patients as the external test set. Postoperative pathological confirmation served as the reference standard for CLNM diagnosis. A total of 1,561 radiomics features and 2,048 deep learning features were extracted from intra- and peri-tumoral regions of each ultrasound image. Feature selection was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), resulting in the selection of relevant features for constructing support vector machine (SVM) models. Additionally, radiomics-deep learning fusion models were developed by combining selected radiomics and deep learning features. Results: Among 405 patients (mean age: 46.59±12.74 years; 68.6% female), 171 exhibited CLNM, highlighting the clinical urgency for accurate prediction. Among the 405 patients, 171 exhibited CLNM. The radiomics models demonstrated area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.760 in internal validation and 0.748 in the external test cohort. The deep learning models demonstrated improved performance with AUCs of 0.794 and 0.756 in the internal and external test sets. Notably, the highest AUC values of 0.897 (internal validation) and 0.881 (external test set) were obtained by the radiomics-deep learning fusion SVM model incorporating both intra- and peri-tumoral regions. DeLong's test confirmed statistically significant improvements (P<0.05) of the fusion model over the intra-tumoral radiomics model (P=0.008), intra-tumoral deep learning model (P=0.005), and combined intra-tumoral radiomics-deep learning model (P=0.01). However, no significant differences were observed compared to the combined intra- and peri-tumoral deep learning model (P=0.17). Decision curve analysis indicated that the fusion model offers greater clinical utility in predicting CLNM. Conclusions: The integration of radiomics and deep learning features significantly enhances the diagnostic performance for predicting CLNM in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The radiomics-deep learning fusion SVM model outperforms individual radiomics and deep learning models, demonstrating substantial potential for clinical application in improving surgical decision-making and patient management. The fusion model could reduce unnecessary central lymph node dissections (CLNDs) and improve surgical planning by providing personalized risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.