ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2025
Development and validation of potential molecular subtypes and signatures of ocular sarcoidosis based on autophagy-related gene analysis.
Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sarcoidosis is characterized by the proliferation of noncaseating granulomas and presents as a complex chronic inflammatory disease. Autophagy plays a crucial role in the initiation, progression, and treatment resistance of various cancers. Despite the recognized importance of autophagy, the involvement of autophagy-related genes (ARGs) in the pathophysiology of ocular sarcoidosis (OS) remains largely unexplored. Methods: We intersected differentially expressed genes with a curated list of 177 ARGs to identify candidates potentially involved in OS. Advanced methodologies, including GSEA and GSVA, were employed to explore the biological functions. Further refinement using Lasso regression and SVM-RFE allowed for the identification of key hub genes and the assessment of their diagnostic potential for OS. Results: Our investigation identified 11 ARGs (DRAM1, SOGA1, ATG16L2, FYCO1, ATG7, ATG12, ATG14, KIAA0226, KIAA1324, KIAA1324L, and KIAA0226L) closely associated with OS. Functional analyses revealed their involvement in processes such as extracellular stimulus, response to nutrient levels, and positive regulation of catabolic process. Importantly, the diagnostic capabilities of these ARGs demonstrated significant efficacy in distinguishing OS from unaffected states. Conclusions: Through rigorous bioinformatics analyses, this study identifies 11 ARGs as novel biomarker candidates for OS, elucidating their potential roles in the disease's pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.