Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40771338›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Comparative differences in job preferences among doctors in different levels of public hospitals in Henan, China: a discrete choice experiment.

Jingjing Wang, Hui Lv, Qin Qin, Wenjie Ren, Noorsuzana Mohd Shariff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jingjing WangInstitutes of Health Central Plains, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan, China.
Hui LvThe First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan, China.
Qin QinDepartment of Medical, Quzhou College of Technology, Quzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Wenjie RenInstitutes of Health Central Plains, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan, China.
Noorsuzana Mohd ShariffAdvanced Medical & Dental Institute, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kepala Batas, Penang, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Doctor turnover is a significant challenge faced by hospitals worldwide, particularly in public hospitals in China. By understanding how job attributes influence job preferences among doctors, effective and targeted policies can be designed to attract doctors to key positions or organizations, providing insights for evidence-based workforce interventions. Objectives: The aim of our study is to examine the difference of job preferences of doctors in different hospitals levels using DCE. Methods: A discrete choice experiment was applied in the public hospital in China. A total of 920 eligible doctors from primary, secondary, and tertiary public hospital in China participated in this study. A mixed logit model was applied to assess job preferences among doctors in public hospital in China. Results: Doctors in primary hospitals preferred job offers with 30% salary increase over the unchanged (OR = 8.906, Conclusion: Doctors preferred job offers with salary increases across all hospital levels. Professional development opportunities were prioritized universally, while 20% increase in workload was generally least favored. Environmental support was most important in tertiary hospitals. Monthly salary and work atmosphere were top priorities across all hospital levels, with employee care ranking third in primary and secondary hospitals. Workload and environmental support were the least prioritized, varying by hospital level.

Indexed as

doctorshealthcare workersjob choicesjob postingjob preference

Identifiers

PMID40771338
PMCPMC12325187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.