Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40771331›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Psychotherapy as investigation: cultivating curiosity and insight in the therapeutic process.

Judson A Brewer, Fabio Giommi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Judson A Brewer *Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Fabio Giommi *Nous-School of Specialization (PsyD) in Psychotherapy, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychotherapy training and practice have grown increasingly complex, driven by expanding diagnostic frameworks, theoretical models, and intervention methods. This complexity can at best confuse and at worst overwhelm therapists, limiting therapeutic effectiveness and obscuring the relational core that is crucial to successful therapy. In this paper, we explore a different path than increasing complexity: simplicity. Specifically, drawing on recent insights from psychotherapy research and neuroscience, we highlight the intimate connection between simplicity and curiosity and how different types of curiosity can be operationalized in the therapeutic setting. We also explore how curiosity interacts with generative models or narratives that patients (and therapists) can be overidentified with, leading to confirmation bias. Also, we highlight how curiosity and simplicity can mutually foster each other in the therapeutic relationship, co-emerging as a strong driving factor for therapeutic insight and change. Further, we explore the relationship between curiosity and interoceptive awareness, which can be operationally enhanced by embodied practices (e.g., mindfulness, meditation etc.). Ultimately, rather than the accumulation of knowledge, psychotherapy that centers on curiosity empowers clients toward exploration and adaptive flexibility to foster autonomy and insight, while potentially protecting psychotherapists from stagnation, fostering continued personal and professional growth.

Indexed as

coachingcuriositymindfulnessmonitoringpredictive processingpsychotherapytraining

Identifiers

PMID40771331
PMCPMC12325357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.