ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
A hybrid approach for pattern recognition and interpretation in age-related false memory.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Aging is associated with a decline in essential cognitive functions such as language processing, memory, and attention, which significantly impacts the quality of life in later years. Despite the serious consequences of age-related cognitive decline, particularly in the formation of false memories, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. This knowledge gap is partly due to limitations in current methodologies used to examine age-related cognitive changes and their origins. Methods: In the present study, a hybrid approach was developed that combines optimized machine learning techniques with large-scale transformer-based language models to identify behavioral patterns distinguishing true from false memories in both younger and older adults. The best-performing model, a modified version of the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), identified nine key features using permutation importance. Feature interactions with age were further examined to understand their relationship with cognitive decline. Additionally, the modified LightGBM was integrated with a language model to enhance interpretability. Results: The findings revealed that younger adults benefited from target encoding time during reading, which helped them correctly reject misleading information (lures), whereas older adults were more vulnerable to inference caused by semantic similarity. Discussion: These results offer important insights into the mechanisms of false memory in aging populations and demonstrate the utility of hybrid computational methods in uncovering behavioral patterns related to memory decline. The modified LightGBM achieved the highest overall performance with an F1-score of 0.82 and recall of 0.88, outperforming all evaluated deep learning and transformer-based models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.