ArticleFuture healthcare journal2025
Evaluation of the Bluetooth-enabled Scanbo device for point-of-care measurement of blood pressure and blood glucose: A cross-sectional pilot study in an urban slum of Bengaluru.
Article in Future healthcare journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Letter to the editor: 'Evaluation of the Bluetooth-enabled Scanbo device for point-of-care measurement of blood pressure and blood glucose: A cross-sectional pilot study in an urban slum of Bengaluru'.Future healthcare journal · 2025Article
- The all-encompassing vision ofFuture healthcare journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As non-communicable diseases escalate globally, timely and accurate monitoring of health indicators like blood pressure and blood glucose becomes critical. The Scanbo device, a Bluetooth-enabled point-of-care tool, promises to revolutionise this monitoring by offering quick and reliable measurements. Objectives: To validate the concordance of the results of the Scanbo device compared with the Omron for blood pressure and with the diagnostic lab method for blood sugar. Methods: This observational cross-sectional pilot study was conducted in the urban slum of Vijinapura (Bengaluru) to evaluate the accuracy of the Scanbo device. We enrolled 128 participants for blood pressure assessments and 69 for blood glucose measurement, selecting adults from the community based on predefined criteria. The primary variables measured included systolic and diastolic blood pressures and blood glucose levels, with data collected using both the Scanbo device and standard measurement methods for comparison. Data were recorded and analysed to ensure consistency and reliability. Statistical analyses were performed using Jamovi 2.3.28 solid version (The Jamovi project, 2021, https://www.jamovi.org), employing Bland-Altman plots to assess agreement, Cohen's kappa for inter-rater reliability, and ROC curves to determine diagnostic accuracy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were also estimated. Results: The Scanbo device showed excellent accuracy in measuring systolic blood pressure (AUC = 0.985) and blood glucose (AUC = 0.973), with substantial agreement in reliability (Cohen's kappa > 0.67 for all measurements). Diastolic blood pressure measurements were also accurate (AUC = 0.924), although slightly less so than systolic measurements. The mean differences between the Scanbo and standard measurements, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were within clinically acceptable limits. Conclusions: The Scanbo device demonstrates a high level of accuracy and reliability comparable to standard methods for systolic and diastolic blood pressure and blood glucose measurements. These findings support the potential integration of the Scanbo device into routine clinical practice, particularly for community health settings and patient self-monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.