ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Patient-reported Outcomes Following Intercostal Nerve Transfer to Musculocutaneous Nerve at a Median Follow-up of 3.5 Years.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Motor Nerve Transfers in Complete and Incomplete Brachial Plexus Injuries: A State-of-the-Art Review.Neurology international · 2026Review
- Quality of life in patients following distal nerve transfers for the restoration of elbow flexion and extension- single center experience.Brain & spine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of neurotization of the musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) using intercostal nerves (ICNs) to restore elbow flexion in patients with complete brachial plexus paralysis (CBPP). We assessed quality of life through patient-reported outcome measures and examined the impact on respiratory function. Methods: This retrospective study included 17 patients with CBPP who underwent ICN transfer to the MCN. The median follow-up was 3.5 years. Outcome measures included elbow flexion strength (British Medical Research Council grading), quality of life (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Short Form-36), and respiratory function. Patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated using the Overall Subjective Self-Assessment score. Results: The median age at the time of injury was 24 years (interquartile range: 19-28 y). Seven (41%) patients achieved elbow flexion strength of M3 or higher. The median active elbow flexion was 120 degrees in patients with strength of M3 or higher, compared with 25 degrees in those with strength less than M3 ( Conclusions: Neurotization of the MCN with ICN in patients with CBPP can restore functional elbow flexion and improve quality of life without adversely affecting respiratory function. Although improvements remain modest, the restored elbow flexion significantly enhances upper limb function, supporting its continued use as a viable treatment option in the management of CBPP.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.