ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Parental behavior and near screen use in childhood: a route to reduce screen induced myopia.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Screen Time and Myopia-Related Outcomes in European Children: A Systematic Review.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Continuous near work activities like near screen use contribute to the surge in myopia (near sight) prevalence, worldwide particularly among youth. Parental management skills play a crucial role in guiding children's use of digital screens. The aim of the study was to assess near screen use among children and to investigate the role of parental behavioral determinants in its management. Methods: We conducted an online survey among 395 parents of 9-12-year-olds. We assessed behavioral determinants, components of the CASI-model (Communication Activation Strategic Instrument), near screen use, and parental management, including knowledge, attitude, risk-perception, self-efficacy and (influence of) social environment. We performed logistic regression with parental management skills as outcome, adjusted for parental educational level, age and sex of the child. Results: Of the 395 9-12-year-olds, 78.7% had their own smart phone. Of these children, 26.0% spent more than 2 h a day on near screens at home. 75.1% of the parents had heard about myopia, of these 59.3% made a significant effort to reduce screen time (odds ratio, 95%-confidence interval: 2.62; 1.59-4.29). Only 28.1% of parents considered the risk of myopia due to handheld screen use to be high, and 62.6% of them spent relatively more efforts to minimize near screen time (1.32; 1.01-1.72). A more negative attitude of parents toward screens was associated with more efforts to reduce screen time (1.25; 1.17-1.35), as was a higher self-efficacy (1.08; 1.03-1.13). Surprisingly, a significant negative association was found between confidence in one's ability to reduce screen use and the efforts made (0.76; 0.58-0.99). Conclusions: Parents' knowledge, attitude and self-efficacy relate to their management skills of screen use of children. Mass media campaigns targeting these determinants in parents could help to reduce the risks of myopia and associated complications later in life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.