ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
A study on the construction of a nurse refresher training system in traditional Chinese medicine hospitals using the Delphi method.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- "More Than My Own Effort": A Qualitative Study of Factors Influencing EBP Competence Among Traditional Chinese Medicine Specialist Nurses.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Construction and practice of a multi-station Chinese medicine specialist nurse training system based on core competencies: a Delphi study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Behavioral measures and factors influencing active use of health services in school hospitals by university students.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to develop a standardized advanced training system for nursing staff in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) hospitals and verify its effectiveness. Methods: Based on literature review, training demand research, and semi-structured interviews, this study established a draft training system for TCM nursing staff. 12 experts refined the system through two rounds of correspondence using the Delphi method. Forty-five teachers engaged in clinical teaching were invited to evaluate the course quality, course setting, training programs, training effectiveness, teacher teaching quality, and full-score evaluation rate before and after the application of the training system. Results: The recovery rates for the two rounds of questionnaires were 100 and 91.67%, respectively, with authority coefficients of 0.938 and 0.953, and coordination coefficients of 0.233 and 0.239. The final training system included 15 first-level, 49 s-level, and 85 third-level indexes. Scores in the training effect evaluation significantly improved after applying the training system ( Conclusion: It is concluded that the training system constructed in this study is scientific, reliable, and valid, and can provide guidance for the training of TCM nursing staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.