Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40771234›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Enhancing the public health academic's role in community engagement: building trusting relationships through support service delivery.

Angela Carman, Ashley Grospitch, Mary Elizabeth Pendergrass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Angela CarmanUniversity of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, United States.
Ashley GrospitchUniversity of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, United States.
Mary Elizabeth PendergrassUniversity of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community engagement processes, specifically when initiated or led by public health researchers/academics often take the form of "outreach," wherein the academic contacts a community experiencing a public health problem to perform a research study about the problem, or "consultation," where the academic content expert is called on by a community to share what is known about a particular public health problem. Both of these forms of community engagement and those involving the public health academic/researcher have the potential to provide elements of community health improvement to the citizens in the community. Consider public health academic approaches to community engagement grounded in research models such as Community-Based Participatory Research, Implementation Research, and Team Science. Each of these models and strategies through which public health academics engage with communities have been widely used with many documented successful conclusions. However, based on work by the authors in communities across Kentucky over the past 10 + years, the possibility exists that specifically in rural communities with multiple public health issues and the frequent existence of a fractured public health infrastructure, another form of community engagement is needed for even better health improvement results. Although many Local Health Departments across the United States serve rural communities, only a small proportion of their directors have a formal public health education. With the increasing public health concerns of many areas, specifically those in rural areas like the majority of communities in Kentucky, the strain on the LHD staff and members of their community partner systems is great. From this perspective, the authors propose that the missing link in the previously discussed community engagement methods of outreach, consultation, and collaboration is support service delivery. Support service delivery, as we propose, would be delivered in a similar mechanism to preceptor guided training in certain health disciplines in which the expert demonstrates, teaches, and supports until the student is ready to practice alone. Through the support service delivery process, trust is built and sustained within communities as an essential component of public health academic community engagement.

Indexed as

Community-Institutional RelationsPublic HealthTrustCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHumansKentuckyacademiacommunity engagementcommunity healthpublic healthsupport service delivery

Identifiers

PMID40771234
PMCPMC12325234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.