ArticleIEEE robotics and automation letters2024
Kinematic Benefits of a Cable-Driven Exosuit for Head-Neck Mobility.
Article in IEEE robotics and automation letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating Range of Motion of Two Prominent Neck Support Devices for Daily Activities.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a novel cable-driven exosuit intended for head-neck support and movement assistance. Mobility limitations in the head-neck, such as dropped head syndrome, can result from various neurological disorders. Current solutions, ranging from static neck collars to rigid-link robotic neck exoskeletons, are unsatisfactory. Neck collars are the most used clinically but fail to restore head-neck motion. Rigid-link neck exoskeletons can enable head movement but are bulky and restrictive. In this paper, we present the design of this exosuit, an analysis of its ability to balance the gravitational moment of the head in simulation, and the results of a user study comparing its kinematic performance to a state-of-the-art rigid-link neck exoskeleton. The exosuit is able to support the head across its full range of motion according to simulation results. It fits users of different sizes and participants exhibited more natural head-neck movement wearing the exosuit as compared to wearing the rigid-link exoskeleton. The exosuit allowed more head rotations than the rigid-link neck exoskeleton and required less compensatory torso movement for three daily tasks (looking for traffic, drinking from a bottle, and picking up an object from the floor). Its absolute range of motion was also much larger than the one allowed by the rigid-link neck exoskeleton. These results demonstrate the kinematic benefits of a cable-driven neck exosuit and provide justification for studying the use of such an exosuit for head-neck movement assistance in patient groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.