ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
The effects of beta-hydroxy-beta-methyl butyrate supplementation in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Nutritional Supplements for Muscle Hypertrophy: Mechanisms and Morphology-Focused Evidence.Nutrients · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB) is a nutritional supplement that has demonstrated favorable effects on restoring muscle mass. However, evidence to support its use in patients underlying surgery remains unclear. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of HMB in this population to ascertain its effect. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on surgical patients receiving HMB compared to controls. The last search was March 15, 2025. Length of stay (LOS) and postoperative complications were the primary outcomes. We assessed study quality and performed subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and the GRADE system to explore potential heterogeneity. Results: Eleven RCTs with 575 patients were included. There are some differences in study design, HMB protocols, and muscle measurements among these trials. Overall, HMB significantly reduced the hospital LOS (MD -0.90 days; 95% CI, -1.79 to -0.01; Conclusion: HMB supplement seems to significantly improve hospital LOS and postoperative complications, as well as some outcomes of muscle measurements and physical function. However, due to the significantly heterogeneity among the included studies, more well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.