ArticleBJPsych bulletin2025
Rethinking youth emergency mental healthcare in the UK: insights from Australian service models.
Article in BJPsych bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Response to 'International trends in male youth suicide and suicidal behaviour'.Acta neuropsychiatrica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emergency mental healthcare for young people in the UK has been described as fragmented, risk-driven and under-resourced. Drawing on insights from Australian service models, this editorial explores how timely, integrated and relational care can improve outcomes and reduce harm. Key innovations, including early intervention hubs, assertive aftercare, outreach models and telehealth, are examined through a realist lens to explain how and why they work. Recommendations are offered for rethinking the strategy and provision of youth crisis care in the UK, centred on developmental need, relational continuity and a departure from risk assessment tools that lack an evidence base.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.