Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40770996›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

The evolution of Gaia(s).

Timothy M Lenton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Overlapping attempts to falsify and Darwinize the Gaia hypothesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Chance and purpose in the evolution of biospheres.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Timothy M LentonGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6725-7498

Funding

John Templeton Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Earth's biosphere, or 'Gaia', has increased its own persistence and flourishing through intense global cycling of essential elements, and net stabilization of atmospheric composition and climate. A key question is how has it acquired these remarkable properties? Did it involve some form of natural selection among parts of the biosphere? (And if so; which parts?) Or could these properties arise another way? A physical explanation is that in a complex system containing a source of variation and some 'memory' of past states, the most probable trajectory is towards a state of greater size, diversity and stability. Models show this state tends to be reached through a series of progressively more stable configurations, separated by system reorganizations, which become more difficult and thus less frequent over time. Such Gaia-level evolution can also be interpreted in terms of selection among ecosystems and nutrient cycles based on how well they persist and/or spread. Thus, what seem very different physical and biological paths to explaining Gaia are converging. The resulting theory makes testable predictions about how Earth's biosphere evolved that are consistent with available evidence. It also makes predictions of how biospheres in general evolve, which will become testable if/when exo-biospheres are detected.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Chance and purpose in the evolution of biospheres'.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEarth, PlanetEcosystemSelection, GeneticbiosphereentropyevolutionGaiaselectionsystems

Identifiers

PMID40770996
PMCPMC12329439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.