ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
The evolution of Gaia(s).
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards Pragmatist Thermodynamics: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Entropy and Sustainability.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Overlapping attempts to falsify and Darwinize the Gaia hypothesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Chance and purpose in the evolution of biospheres.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The Earth's biosphere, or 'Gaia', has increased its own persistence and flourishing through intense global cycling of essential elements, and net stabilization of atmospheric composition and climate. A key question is how has it acquired these remarkable properties? Did it involve some form of natural selection among parts of the biosphere? (And if so; which parts?) Or could these properties arise another way? A physical explanation is that in a complex system containing a source of variation and some 'memory' of past states, the most probable trajectory is towards a state of greater size, diversity and stability. Models show this state tends to be reached through a series of progressively more stable configurations, separated by system reorganizations, which become more difficult and thus less frequent over time. Such Gaia-level evolution can also be interpreted in terms of selection among ecosystems and nutrient cycles based on how well they persist and/or spread. Thus, what seem very different physical and biological paths to explaining Gaia are converging. The resulting theory makes testable predictions about how Earth's biosphere evolved that are consistent with available evidence. It also makes predictions of how biospheres in general evolve, which will become testable if/when exo-biospheres are detected.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Chance and purpose in the evolution of biospheres'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.