ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
DPANN Archaea and CPR Bacteria: insights into early cellular evolution?
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phylogenetic reconciliation supports a methanogenic ancestor of the Archaea and a derived origin for host-associated lineages.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Divergent evolution of the PRPS enzymes across the tree of life.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Chance and purpose in the evolution of biospheres.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Purifying selection and low recombination facilitated sequential colonization of benthic and pelagic coastal ocean by ammonia-oxidizing archaea.ISME communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cultivation-independent techniques have facilitated the discovery of a diversity of thus far uncultivated organisms and led to the identification of new branches within the tree of life. This has reshaped the general view of key evolutionary processes and challenged fundamental understandings of cellular evolution. Two diverse and phylogenetically relevant lineages are the Diapherotrites, Parv-, Aenigma-, Nano- and Nanohaloarchaeota (DPANN) archaea and the Candidate Phyla Radiation (CPR) bacteria, originally proposed to form sister groups of all other Archaea and Bacteria, respectively. Members of the DPANN and CPR have reduced genome and cell sizes and incomplete biosynthetic pathways. In addition, the co-cultivation of the first DPANN and CPR representatives with their respective hosts indicates that they comprise many symbionts. While initial work has suggested that these two prokaryotic groups could have important implications for understanding cellular evolution and the complexity of the ancestors of the Archaea and Bacteria, respectively, more recent data have indicated that they may be derived organisms or have evolved in parallel with their partner organisms. Here, we provide insights into debates on the phylogenetic placement of these radiations and discuss implications for cellular evolution and the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) in light of Earth history.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Chance and purpose in the evolution of biospheres'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.