Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40770993›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

The chitin raft hypothesis for the colonization of the open ocean by cyanobacteria.

Rogier Braakman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Chance and purpose in the evolution of biospheres.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rogier BraakmanDepartment of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4485-8450

Funding

National Science FoundationSimons Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is often assumed planktonic cyanobacteria existed in Precambrian oceans, but that their productivity was constrained. However, available evidence suggests picocyanobacteria only colonized the open ocean near the Neoproterozoic-Phanerozoic boundary, close to the start of a period of sustained atmospheric oxygenation. If earlier open oceans were devoid of planktonic cyanobacteria, we lack consensus explanations for why this was the case. Colleagues and I recently introduced the 'chitin raft hypothesis', which argues that accumulating chitin particulate waste associated with the rise of arthropods provided an essential evolutionary stepping stone in the rise of marine picocyanobacteria. According to this hypothesis, chitin particles derived from arthropod exoskeleton moults offered marine picocyanobacteria refugia from environmental stresses in the water column, allowing them to explore-and begin adapting to-the open ocean for the first time. Here, I review the context and implications of this hypothesis. One implication is that Precambrian biospheric productivity was constrained by the total global volume of benthic habitats. Hence, the rise of sub-aerial continents near the Archaean-Proterozoic boundary would have driven a major increase in biospheric productivity, with the expansion of oxygenic photosynthesis into the open ocean and onto the continents near the Proterozoic-Phanerozoic boundary driving a second major increase.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Chance and purpose in the evolution of biospheres'.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionChitinCyanobacteriaEcosystemOceans and SeasChitinatmospheric oxygenationbiospheric productivitymetabolic evolutionplanktonic marine cyanobacteria

Identifiers

PMID40770993
PMCPMC12329445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.