ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
The evolution of the tree of life.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chance and purpose in the evolution of biospheres.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The tree of life is one of the most important organizing principles in biology. Updates and revisions are historically derived from improved data capture, increasingly refined models of evolution and expanded taxon sampling. Tracing the changes in the tree of life over the molecular era (1990-present) highlights the evolution of biologists' understanding of life on earth and serves as a foil placing the explosion of available data over this timeframe in context. Using current-day information, we explored the taxonomic growth captured in a tree of life through historic tree reconstruction. Data capture is now facilitating improvements in genome quality rather than expanding deep diversity, as the rate of novel phylum discovery is slowing for bacteria and archaea. Using dissimilarity metrics, the proportion of changes that each historic tree encompasses identified a diminishing influence of additional taxa on high-level topological revisions. No trees recapitulated current hypotheses for deep relationships on the tree of life, reflective of disadvantages associated with high taxon sampling and the divide-and-conquer methodologies required to analyse extremely large datasets. This work clarifies the effect of the interaction between data quality, data quantity and taxonomic diversity on our ability to construct a stable tree of life.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Chance and purpose in the evolution of biospheres'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.