Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40770978›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

What the earliest evidence for life tells us about the early evolution of the biosphere.

Frances Westall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. What the earliest evidence for life tells us about the early evolution of the biosphere.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Chance and purpose in the evolution of biospheres.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Frances WestallCentre de Biophysique Moléculaire, CNRS, Orléans, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1938-5823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Life emerged on Earth in an ultramafic world under anaerobic conditions and conditioned by particular environmental characteristics for which no record remains. Molecular clocks suggest that the Last Universal Common Ancestor, LUCA, lived in a well-established biome towards the end of the Hadean, between 4.33 and 4.09 Ga. They also suggest that the last bacterial common ancestor (LBCA) and the last archaeal common ancestor (LACA) may have diverged by the Palaeoarchaean, i.e. earlier than suggested by phylogenetic dating. Moreover, various geochemical and isotopic proxies for specific microbial metabolisms have been used to date the appearance of certain metabolic pathways in geological time. According to some molecular clocks, oxygenic photosynthesis arose in the Palaeoarchaean (3.5-3.2 Ga) and some geochemical studies point to oxygenic photosynthesis already in Eoarchaean times. The bulk of the geological evidence, however, indicates its appearance in the Mesoarchaean (3.2-2.8 Ga). This contribution explores the geological and palaeontological evidence for these interpretations and cautions the need to take into account other, abiotic influences on the proxy signatures, as well as the importance of basing interpretations of biogenicity on a complementary suite of proxies to ensure correct elucidations.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Chance and purpose in the evolution of biospheres'.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaBiological EvolutionOrigin of LifeFossilsPhylogenychemotrophyearly lifephototrophy

Identifiers

PMID40770978
PMCPMC12329462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.