Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40770977›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

Other Earths, Gaian bottlenecks and Darwinized Gaias.

Charles H Lineweaver, Aditya Chopra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Chance and purpose in the evolution of biospheres.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Charles H LineweaverResearch School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University, Weston Creek, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2047-1558
Aditya ChopraResearch School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University, Weston Creek, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1488-5829

Funding

Royal Society
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In our galaxy, tens of billions of wet, rocky Earth-like planets orbit in the habitable zones of their host stars. Stellar spectra and models of devolatilization yield ranges of plausible chemistries on these Earths. The early emergence of biology on Earth from similar chemistry has a chance of being universally relevant to the origins of life elsewhere. The Gaian bottleneck suggests that most life does not establish Gaian regulation quickly enough to counter positive feedback of runaway greenhouse or runaway ice albedo. Methane (a strong greenhouse gas) was produced by methanogens and oxidized by anaerobic methanotrophs. Their combined effects could have influenced global temperature. As the branches of the phylogenetic tree of life diverge and get pruned, the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) changes and evolves. This adds a time-dependence to LUCA. We argue that the source of LUCA's adaptations is evolution by natural selection at the sub-global level through the extinction of competitors. By surviving a persistence/non-persistence-based selection on the global level, these adaptations qualify as global-level adaptations or Gaian regulation. Thus, within a Darwinian framework, LUCA's sub-global adaptations can become Gaia's global adaptations: Darwinized Gaias may be rare but they are plausible.This article is part of the theme issue discussion meeting issue 'Chance and purpose in the evolution of biospheres' .

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEarth, PlanetOrigin of LifeSelection, GeneticPhylogenybiosphereexoplanetsGaiaplanetary habitability

Identifiers

PMID40770977
PMCPMC12329459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.