ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Trends and Efficacy in Clostridioides difficile Infection Management at a Polish Clinical Hospital.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a significant clinical problem. Treatment includes fidaxomicin and vancomycin, with second and subsequent recurrences treated with decreasing doses or sequential therapy with rifaximin, as well as considering treatment with a fecal transplant. This study aimed to analyze the method of treatment of CDI among patients hospitalized at the University Clinical Hospital in Wrocław (Poland). MATERIAL AND METHODS The study was conducted by analyzing medical records from 316 patients treated between 2016 and 2018. Due to the limited number of patients treated with fidaxomicin and rifaximin per year, these cases were combined for analysis when exploring the relationship between the year of hospitalization and CDI treatment. Patients spanning the turn of the year were assigned to the year with a longer hospitalization duration for a more robust analysis. RESULTS The predominant treatments for CDI were metronidazole and vancomycin in combination (40.5%), metronidazole alone (26.9%), and vancomycin alone (20.6%). Fidaxomicin was rarely used (1.6%) despite its 100% effectiveness. Although administered to only 5 patients, fidaxomicin achieved a 100% cure rate, highlighting its therapeutic promise. Treatment patterns shifted over the study period, but no significant difference in mortality was observed between years (P=0.904). Overall mortality among CDI patients was 24.7%, compared to 1.52% in the general inpatient population. Patients who died were more likely to have received metronidazole + vancomycin (P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS The mortality rate among CDI patients was notably high. Use of metronidazole alone decreased while alternative therapies (rifaximin, fidaxomicin) increased, but without impacting year-to-year mortality differences. Given its 100% cure rate in our cohort, broader use of fidaxomicin could meaningfully improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.